INTERPRETATION |
Interpretation's Date: May 11, 2022 by superintendent W. Clayton Burch Section: IV. Students |
Interpretation |
May 11, 2022 Mr. James P. Gray, President Fayette County Board of
Education 111 Fayette Avenue Fayetteville, WV 25840 Dear President Gray: You
have requested an interpretation of school law pursuant to W. Va. Code §18-3-6,
and clarification of the meaning of a certain provision of W. Va. Code §18-5-16
and related W. Va. 126CSR189, Policy 7212, Intercounty Transfer Appeal,
effective November 15, 2021.
Additionally, you have requested an interpretation of how these
provisions should be read with or against a certain provision of W. Va. Code
§18-5-15(a). Specifically,
you have requested an interpretation of the following scenarios as they relate
to intercountry transfers. W. Va. Code
§18-5-16(c)(4), states, “An application may only be denied by a county board of
education due to lack of grade level capacity or if the nonresident student
failed to fill out or submit the application correctly,” and that Policy 7212
mirrors the statute at §3.3.c.1., “There is a lack of grade level capacity in
the receiving county,” and at §3.3.c.2., “The nonresident student failed to
submit the transfer application correctly.” W.
Va. Code §18-5-15(a), states, “That any student suspended or expelled from
public or private school shall only be permitted to enroll in public school
upon the approval of the superintendent of the county where the student seeks
enrollment: Provided, however, that in making such decision, the principal of
the school in which the student may enroll shall be consulted by the superintendent
and the principal may make a recommendation to the superintendent concerning
the student’s enrollment in his or her new school. Provided further, that if
enrollment to public school is denied by the superintendent, the student may
petition the board of education where the student seeks enrollment.” Referencing
the above sections of code and policy, I will provide my interpretations on the
scenarios below: Mr. James P. Gray, President May
11, 2022 Page
2 1.
Student
A is expelled from County A for 365 days. During the period of expulsion,
Student A applies for an intercountry transfer to County B. County B’s
alternative instruction for expelled students is virtual, which comes with a
cost. Student A correctly filled out and completed the application. In
this scenario, the student has not been determined a “dangerous student.” In the case of
Student A, County B would have the right to deny the
intercounty transfer until the period of expulsion has been completed. If a family physically moves into another county then enrollment would have to be completed. 2.
If
Student A in scenario 1 must be accepted by County B, is County A or County B
responsible for the costs of education (e.g. virtual
school)? Since Student
A does not have to be accepted by County B unless they become a physical
resident of the county, this is not an issue that needs addressed. 3.
Other
than in cases of expulsion, is there any autonomy afforded the receiving county
to evaluate and deny an application on the basis of
prior discipline of the student from the sending/resident county? Based on the
policy and code sections previously mentioned, the receiving county does not
have the flexibility to look at prior discipline reports and use it as a basis
for denial. Sincerely, /s/ W. Clayton Burch State Superintendent of Schools |